168 Comments
тна Return to thread

Is the Phillies pedal-to-the metal, high powered offense, defense be damned approach entertaining to watch or terrible to watch? Maybe it depends on whether you're a neutral observer of a Phillies fan.

Expand full comment

Always fun to watch the Phillies Follies! Endless entertainment!

Expand full comment

Both? The way baseball games are structured, it seems pretty clear they would be really entertaining for half an inning and then really terrible to watch for half an inning

Expand full comment

2 Championships in 140 years of NL ball explains the Follies perfectly.

Expand full comment

From 1918 through 1948, the Phillies had 1 (ONE!) season with a winning record.

The '32 Phillies went 78-76.

Of course, those 'winning' ways didn't stick - they then proceeded to fire off 13 seasons of finishing last or 2nd-to-last.

Expand full comment

They played at the Baker Bowl in North Philly which had a 60 ft. RF fence. To my knowledge nobody called it a monster, it was covered with a huge ad that said "The Phillies use Lifebouy Soap" and the fans would always add "and they still stink"

Expand full comment

In 1930 the league OPS at the Baker Bowl was around 90 points higher than the 2nd best hitters' park, Wrigley Field.

That's roughly the same degree to which the league OPS at 1993 Mile High Stadium was higher than at the 2nd best hitters' park. (Also Wrigley Field - cool!)

(And with the humidor, the Denver effect is really tamped down - last season the OPS at Coors was virtually identical as at GABP or Rogers Centre.)

Expand full comment