I don’t get too worked up about it. He is long dead and the work itself was good. Just my own little protest: I wouldn’t pay to see (almost) anything related to Dahl.
My exception was when Kid #2 performed in the high school James and The Giant Peach production some years ago. Support for my kids takes precedence the same-ish way I am not…
I don’t get too worked up about it. He is long dead and the work itself was good. Just my own little protest: I wouldn’t pay to see (almost) anything related to Dahl.
My exception was when Kid #2 performed in the high school James and The Giant Peach production some years ago. Support for my kids takes precedence the same-ish way I am not immediately canceling my subscription here but won’t renew absent migration. And likewise I didn’t dump out my bottle of Bulleit when the booze family dumped its Queer child from management; I drank it then switched ryes.
Don't take my throwaway comment as the last word. They may well have reconciled in the years since it was newsworthy.
And FWIW, there was a dispute about whether it was her sexual preferences or her professional marketing (IIRC) skills that were the cause. She wouldn't be the first legacy child promoted beyond her skills due to her selection of parents.
My position was that for something as fungible as my standard Rye (and occasional bourbon) pour I could treat accusation itself as sufficient evidence. Others may well have different levels of proof without being ethically challenged.
I don’t get too worked up about it. He is long dead and the work itself was good. Just my own little protest: I wouldn’t pay to see (almost) anything related to Dahl.
My exception was when Kid #2 performed in the high school James and The Giant Peach production some years ago. Support for my kids takes precedence the same-ish way I am not immediately canceling my subscription here but won’t renew absent migration. And likewise I didn’t dump out my bottle of Bulleit when the booze family dumped its Queer child from management; I drank it then switched ryes.
I didn’t know about Bulleit. People are horrible
Don't take my throwaway comment as the last word. They may well have reconciled in the years since it was newsworthy.
And FWIW, there was a dispute about whether it was her sexual preferences or her professional marketing (IIRC) skills that were the cause. She wouldn't be the first legacy child promoted beyond her skills due to her selection of parents.
My position was that for something as fungible as my standard Rye (and occasional bourbon) pour I could treat accusation itself as sufficient evidence. Others may well have different levels of proof without being ethically challenged.